PvP statistics EU Current season

Strategic.GG // Representation lab

EU Solo Shuffle — Feral Druid statistics

See who is represented in Blizzard's current-season, provider-returned leaderboard, how that representation changes across the selected scope, which Hero Talent trees appear in recent saved profiles, and how ratings are distributed.

Choose a bracket

Arena

Battlegrounds

Solo Shuffle overall

Solo Shuffle by specialization

Battleground Blitz by specialization

Current statistics available. The leaderboard was observed at 2026-09-04 22:02:34 UTC.

Population controls

Choose who the charts describe

Choose a leaderboard depth, or use a rating range instead. A rating range searches the complete returned board and applies consistently to representation, Hero Talents, and rating distribution.

Current view: All returned rows

Reset filters

At a glance

The selected leaderboard sample

Selected population
1,252
Unit: leaderboard rows
Qualified attribution
1,252
100.0% coverage
Unknown
0
Kept inside the denominator
Representation observations
2026-09-04 22:02–2026-09-04 22:02 UTC
Oldest to newest

Representation

Class and specialization share

Official board specialization. Blizzard names this class and specialization in the official leaderboard itself.

Each count is a numerator over 1,252 (leaderboard rows). Unknown facts remain in that denominator. Every bar uses the same zero-to-100% share scale, and the exact count and share are printed on every row.

Leaderboard and qualifying attribution evidence spans 2026-09-04 22:02–2026-09-04 22:02 UTC.

Qualified coverage 1,252 · 100.0%

Unknown: 0.

Class distribution

Exact counts and shares of the selected population.

  • Druid 1252 · 100.0%
  • Unknown 0 · 0.0%
View class data table
Class representation counts and shares
ClassCountShare
Druid1252100.0%
Unknown00.0%

Specialization distribution

The attribution method above governs every specialization row.

  • Feral Druid 1252 · 100.0%
  • Unknown 0 · 0.0%
View specialization data table
Specialization representation counts and shares
SpecializationCountShare
Feral Druid1252100.0%
Unknown00.0%

Normalized representation

Representation relative to the full returned board

Formula v1: selected-scope share divided by the same specialization's share among all provider-returned leaderboard rows for this region, season, and bracket. A ratio of 1.0x is proportional; the selected population is 1,252 and the comparison population is 1,252.

Selected-scope attribution coverage is 100.0% (1,252 attributed; 0 Unknown). Comparison attribution coverage is 100.0% (1,252 attributed; 0 Unknown). Both Unknown groups remain inside their denominators. Selected-scope evidence was observed 2026-09-04 22:02–2026-09-04 22:02 UTC. Comparison evidence was observed 2026-09-04 22:02–2026-09-04 22:02 UTC.

Normalized representation is not applicable to the All view. The selected and comparison populations are identical, so every nonzero specialization would equal 1.0x. Choose a Top-N depth or rating range for a meaningful comparison.

Hero Talents

Current Hero Talent tree choices

Hero Talent trees come from each character's latest saved profile. They describe the last observed active selection and do not prove which tree earned a leaderboard rating. A missing selection remains Unknown; it never counts as an unselected tree.

Of 1,252 leaderboard rows, 952 have a qualifying saved tree selection and 300 are Unknown. Leaderboard and qualifying evidence spans 2026-09-02 00:52–2026-09-04 22:02 UTC.

Hero tree frequency

Every row prints its numerator and share of the full selected denominator.

Coverage 76.0%
  • Wildstalker 802 · 64.1%
  • Druid of the Claw 150 · 12.0%
  • Unknown — no qualifying saved Hero Talent selection 300 · 24.0%
Hero Talent tree counts and shares
Hero Talent treeCountShare
Wildstalker80264.1%
Druid of the Claw15012.0%
Unknown — no qualifying saved Hero Talent selection30024.0%

Rating distribution

Where the selected ratings sit

The ranges below are ordered by rating, not popularity. Each row gives its exact count and share of 1,252 leaderboard rows. Every selected leaderboard row carries a provider-returned rating, so rating coverage is 1,252 of 1,252 with zero Unknown. Contributing leaderboard observations span 2026-09-04 22:02–2026-09-04 22:02 UTC.

25th percentile
383
Median
906
75th percentile
1364

Rating ranges

Bars are scaled to the largest range; exact counts and shares are printed.

  1. 0–99 71 · 5.7%
  2. 100–199 106 · 8.5%
  3. 200–299 114 · 9.1%
  4. 300–399 79 · 6.3%
  5. 400–499 51 · 4.1%
  6. 500–599 52 · 4.2%
  7. 600–699 42 · 3.4%
  8. 700–799 49 · 3.9%
  9. 800–899 58 · 4.6%
  10. 900–999 53 · 4.2%
  11. 1000–1099 56 · 4.5%
  12. 1100–1199 71 · 5.7%
  13. 1200–1299 75 · 6.0%
  14. 1300–1399 84 · 6.7%
  15. 1400–1499 52 · 4.2%
  16. 1500–1599 47 · 3.8%
  17. 1600–1699 50 · 4.0%
  18. 1700–1799 50 · 4.0%
  19. 1800–1899 27 · 2.2%
  20. 1900–1999 21 · 1.7%
  21. 2000–2099 18 · 1.4%
  22. 2100–2199 9 · 0.7%
  23. 2200–2299 7 · 0.6%
  24. 2300–2399 6 · 0.5%
  25. 2400–2499 1 · 0.1%
  26. 2500–2599 1 · 0.1%
  27. 2600–2699 2 · 0.2%
Rating range counts and shares
Rating rangeCountShare
0–99715.7%
100–1991068.5%
200–2991149.1%
300–399796.3%
400–499514.1%
500–599524.2%
600–699423.4%
700–799493.9%
800–899584.6%
900–999534.2%
1000–1099564.5%
1100–1199715.7%
1200–1299756.0%
1300–1399846.7%
1400–1499524.2%
1500–1599473.8%
1600–1699504.0%
1700–1799504.0%
1800–1899272.2%
1900–1999211.7%
2000–2099181.4%
2100–219990.7%
2200–229970.6%
2300–239960.5%
2400–249910.1%
2500–259910.1%
2600–269920.2%

Method and limits

A current retained sample, not a census of every player

These charts cover the current season and the complete leaderboard rows Blizzard returned for this board. They do not describe every World of Warcraft player.

Blizzard names this class and specialization in the official leaderboard itself. Unknown and ambiguous facts remain visible in the denominator rather than being guessed, silently discarded, or filled with zero.

The selected unit is leaderboard rows. Counts, coverage, and observation ranges are printed beside the visual marks so the result remains understandable without relying on bar length or color.