PvP statistics EU Current season

Strategic.GG // Representation lab

EU Battleground Blitz — Assassination Rogue statistics

See who is represented in Blizzard's current-season, provider-returned leaderboard, how that representation changes across the selected scope, which Hero Talent trees appear in recent saved profiles, and how ratings are distributed.

Choose a bracket

Arena

Battlegrounds

Solo Shuffle overall

Solo Shuffle by specialization

Battleground Blitz by specialization

Current statistics available. The leaderboard was observed at 2026-09-04 22:03:47 UTC.

Population controls

Choose who the charts describe

Choose a leaderboard depth, or use a rating range instead. A rating range searches the complete returned board and applies consistently to representation, Hero Talents, and rating distribution.

Current view: Top 1,000

Reset filters

At a glance

The selected leaderboard sample

Selected population
1,000
Unit: leaderboard rows
Qualified attribution
1,000
100.0% coverage
Unknown
0
Kept inside the denominator
Representation observations
2026-09-04 22:03–2026-09-04 22:03 UTC
Oldest to newest

Representation

Class and specialization share

Official board specialization. Blizzard names this class and specialization in the official leaderboard itself.

Each count is a numerator over 1,000 (leaderboard rows). Unknown facts remain in that denominator. Every bar uses the same zero-to-100% share scale, and the exact count and share are printed on every row.

Leaderboard and qualifying attribution evidence spans 2026-09-04 22:03–2026-09-04 22:03 UTC.

Qualified coverage 1,000 · 100.0%

Unknown: 0.

Class distribution

Exact counts and shares of the selected population.

  • Rogue 1000 · 100.0%
  • Unknown 0 · 0.0%
View class data table
Class representation counts and shares
ClassCountShare
Rogue1000100.0%
Unknown00.0%

Specialization distribution

The attribution method above governs every specialization row.

  • Assassination Rogue 1000 · 100.0%
  • Unknown 0 · 0.0%
View specialization data table
Specialization representation counts and shares
SpecializationCountShare
Assassination Rogue1000100.0%
Unknown00.0%

Normalized representation

Representation relative to the full returned board

Formula v1: selected-scope share divided by the same specialization's share among all provider-returned leaderboard rows for this region, season, and bracket. A ratio of 1.0x is proportional; the selected population is 1,000 and the comparison population is 1,422.

Selected-scope attribution coverage is 100.0% (1,000 attributed; 0 Unknown). Comparison attribution coverage is 100.0% (1,422 attributed; 0 Unknown). Both Unknown groups remain inside their denominators. Selected-scope evidence was observed 2026-09-04 22:03–2026-09-04 22:03 UTC. Comparison evidence was observed 2026-09-04 22:03–2026-09-04 22:03 UTC.

Specialization index

Shared 0–1.1x axis. The vertical marker is proportional representation at 1.0x.

1.0x = proportional
  • Assassination Rogue 1.0x · selected 1000 (100.0%) · comparison 1422 (100.0%)
Normalized specialization representation with selected and comparison counts and shares
SpecializationSelectedComparisonRatio
Assassination Rogue1000 · 100.0%1422 · 100.0%1.0x

A zero comparison share is shown as unavailable rather than invented as zero. Drawn bars may stop at the named axis maximum; printed ratios remain exact.

Hero Talents

Current Hero Talent tree choices

Hero Talent trees come from each character's latest saved profile. They describe the last observed active selection and do not prove which tree earned a leaderboard rating. A missing selection remains Unknown; it never counts as an unselected tree.

Of 1,000 leaderboard rows, 854 have a qualifying saved tree selection and 146 are Unknown. Leaderboard and qualifying evidence spans 2026-09-02 00:55–2026-09-04 22:03 UTC.

Hero tree frequency

Every row prints its numerator and share of the full selected denominator.

Coverage 85.4%
  • Fatebound 757 · 75.7%
  • Deathstalker 97 · 9.7%
  • Unknown — no qualifying saved Hero Talent selection 146 · 14.6%
Hero Talent tree counts and shares
Hero Talent treeCountShare
Fatebound75775.7%
Deathstalker979.7%
Unknown — no qualifying saved Hero Talent selection14614.6%

Rating distribution

Where the selected ratings sit

The ranges below are ordered by rating, not popularity. Each row gives its exact count and share of 1,000 leaderboard rows. Every selected leaderboard row carries a provider-returned rating, so rating coverage is 1,000 of 1,000 with zero Unknown. Contributing leaderboard observations span 2026-09-04 22:03–2026-09-04 22:03 UTC.

25th percentile
861
Median
1393
75th percentile
1625

Rating ranges

Bars are scaled to the largest range; exact counts and shares are printed.

  1. 500–599 156 · 15.6%
  2. 700–799 3 · 0.3%
  3. 800–899 138 · 13.8%
  4. 900–999 2 · 0.2%
  5. 1000–1099 3 · 0.3%
  6. 1100–1199 113 · 11.3%
  7. 1200–1299 24 · 2.4%
  8. 1300–1399 71 · 7.1%
  9. 1400–1499 98 · 9.8%
  10. 1500–1599 102 · 10.2%
  11. 1600–1699 124 · 12.4%
  12. 1700–1799 70 · 7.0%
  13. 1800–1899 42 · 4.2%
  14. 1900–1999 24 · 2.4%
  15. 2000–2099 13 · 1.3%
  16. 2100–2199 10 · 1.0%
  17. 2200–2299 4 · 0.4%
  18. 2400–2499 3 · 0.3%
Rating range counts and shares
Rating rangeCountShare
500–59915615.6%
700–79930.3%
800–89913813.8%
900–99920.2%
1000–109930.3%
1100–119911311.3%
1200–1299242.4%
1300–1399717.1%
1400–1499989.8%
1500–159910210.2%
1600–169912412.4%
1700–1799707.0%
1800–1899424.2%
1900–1999242.4%
2000–2099131.3%
2100–2199101.0%
2200–229940.4%
2400–249930.3%

Method and limits

A current retained sample, not a census of every player

These charts cover the current season and the complete leaderboard rows Blizzard returned for this board. They do not describe every World of Warcraft player.

Blizzard names this class and specialization in the official leaderboard itself. Unknown and ambiguous facts remain visible in the denominator rather than being guessed, silently discarded, or filled with zero.

The selected unit is leaderboard rows. Counts, coverage, and observation ranges are printed beside the visual marks so the result remains understandable without relying on bar length or color.